Students with Disabilities in Charter Schools
Legal Cases and Three Dimensions of FAPE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsr.v13i1.2380Keywords:
special education, FAPE, charter schoolsAbstract
Given the increased enrollment of students with disabilities in charter schools, it is important to examine the special education services provided within these settings. The authors examined charter school court cases from the last twenty years to understand the procedural, substantive, and implementation dimensions of free, appropriate public education (FAPE). The Three Dimensions of FAPE Rubric, based on peer-reviewed literature, was used to code court cases. Nine FAPE components were analyzed: individualized assessment, present levels of academic achievement and functional performance, measurable goals, special education services, monitoring student progress, parent involvement in the individualized education program (IEP), placement decision, IEP team members, and implementation of the IEP. Results indicate that the existing court cases involve multi-faceted decision-making, regardless of who brings the claim.
Downloads
Metrics
References or Bibliography
Author. (2018). Three Dimensions of FAPE Rubric (FAPE3DR). Ames, IA: Iowa State University.
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
Cosbert v. Options Public Charter School 116 LRP 13748 (D. D.C., 2012).
Dunn, M. E., Katsiyannis, A., & Ryan, J. B. (2018). Charter schools and students with disabilities: Legal and practice considerations. Intervention in School and Clinic, 53(4), 252-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451217712973
Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, 137 S. Ct. 988 (2017).
Government Accountability Office. (2012). Charter schools: Additional federal attention needed to help protect access for students with disabilities. Washington, DC: National Alliance for Public Charter Schools.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA), P. L. 114-38, 20 U.S.C. § 1414 et seq. (2006).
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act Regulations, 34 C.F.R. §300 et seq. (2012).
National Alliance for Public Charter Schools. (2018). Estimated Charter Public School Enrollment, 2016-17. Retrieved from http://www.publiccharters.org/sites/default/files/migrated/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/EER_Report_V5.pdf
National Center for Education Statistics. (2018). Public Charter School Enrollment. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/indicator_cgb.asp
Pennsylvania Department of Education. (2018). 2017-2018 Cyber and Charter Schools Listing [Data File]. Retrieved from https://www.education.pa.gov/K-12/Charter%20Schools/Pages/default.aspx
Thompson v. Minneapolis School District, 24 IDELR 677 (D. Minn. 1996).
U. S. Department of Education (2017). U.S. Department of Education Awards $253 Million in Grants to Expand Charter Schools.
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2016). Frequently Asked Questions about the Rights of Students with Disabilities in Public Charter Schools under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2014). Dear Colleague Letter: Charter Schools.
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights. (2010). Free Appropriate Public Education for Students With Disabilities: Requirements Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Yell, M. L., & Bateman, D. F. (2017). Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District (2017) FAPE and the U.S. Supreme Court. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 50(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059917721116
Yell, M., Katsiyannis, A., Ennis, R. P., & Losinski, M. (2013). Avoiding procedural errors in individualized education program development. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(1), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005991304600107
Yell, M. L., Katsiyannis, A., Ennis, R. P., Losinski, M., & Christle, C. A. (2016). Avoiding substantive errors in individualized education program development. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 49(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059916662204
Zirkel, P. A., & Bauer, E. T. (2016). The third dimension of FAPE under the IDEA: IEP implementation. Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary, 36(2), 409-427.
Zirkel, P. A. (2018). An analysis of the judicial rulings for transition services under the IDEA. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 41(3), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/2165143417732745
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2024 Dr. Angela Tuttle Prince; Dr. Jeanne Connelly
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
