Total Suspended Sediment Dynamic Under Managed and Unmanaged Conditions in Headwater Watersheds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47611/jsr.v14i1.2935Keywords:
Total suspended sediment, Watershed hydrology, Managed watersheds, Unmanaged watersheds, Sediment dynamics, Piedmont region, Forested ecosystems, Timber harvesting impacts, Sediment transport, Long-term watershed studiesAbstract
This study examined the long-term effects of timber harvesting on total suspended sediment (TSS) in the Piedmont region of North Carolina. It focuses on two headwater catchments (HF1 and HF2) at Hill Demonstration Forest that were converted from hardwoods to pines 12 years ago and continuously monitored for streamflow from 2008 to 2023, and TSS from 2010 to 2013 and 2023. In 2011, HF1 was cleared, and a 15.2-meter vegetated riparian buffer was left around the stream. Selective harvesting in the riparian buffer of HF1 reduced basal area by 27%. The harvest followed the North Carolina Neuse River Basin Riparian Buffer Rule to protect water quality. Following the clearcut, loblolly pine trees were planted in HF1. HF2 was preserved in its natural state to serve as a reference watershed. While TSS concentration did not change significantly after the clearcut from 2011 to 2013 in either watershed, TSS load in the treatment watershed increased substantially, likely due to increased total discharge and movement of in-channel legacy sediment. There were also significant relationships between precipitation and streamflow and TSS load in both HF1 and HF2 watersheds. The close relationship in sediment concentration between HF1 and HF2 indicates sediment dynamics are influenced by increasing weather extremes. Our study provides watershed land managers with important water quality information about managed and unmanaged headwaters.
Downloads
Metrics
References or Bibliography
References
Aust, W. M., Carroll, M.B., Bolding, M.C., & Dolloff, C. A. (2011). Operational Forest Stream Crossings Effects on Water Quality in the Virginia Piedmont, Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages 123–130, https://doi.org/10.1093/sjaf/35.3.123.
Bilotta, G.S., & Brazier, R.E. (2008). Understanding the influence of suspended solids on water quality and aquatic biota. Water Research; 42: (12): 2849-61. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2008.03.018.
Boggs, J., Sun, G., & McNulty, S. (2015). Effects of timber harvest on water quantity and quality in small watersheds in the Piedmont of North Carolina. Journal of Forestry, 114(1), 27-40.
Boggs, J., Sun, G., & McNulty, S. (2016). Paired forested watershed experiments in the Piedmont of North Carolina (General Technical Report SRS-XXX). Southern Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service.
Boggs, J., Sun, G., & McNulty, S. 2017. The effects of stream crossings on total suspended sediment in North Carolina Piedmont forests. Journal of Forestry: 12 pages. DOI:10.5849/jof.2016-059
Cafferata, P. H., & Spittler, T. E. (1998). Logging impacts of the 1970s vs. the 1990s in the Caspar Creek Watershed. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-168.
Caldwell, P. V., Martin, K. L., Vose, J. M., Baker, J. S., Warziniack, T. W., Costanza, J. K., Frey, G. E., Nehra, A., & Mihiar, C. M. (2023). Forested watersheds provide the highest water quality among all land cover types, but the benefit of this ecosystem service depends on landscape context. Science of The Total Environment, 163550. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163550.
Choquette, A. F., Hirsch, R. M., Murphy, J. C., Johnson, L. T., & Confesor Jr., R. B.: (2019). Tracking changes in nutrient delivery to western Lake Erie: Approaches to compensate for variability and trends in streamflow, J. Great Lakes Res., 45, 21–39.
Hewlett, J. D., & Pienaar, L. V. (1973). Design and analysis of the catchment experiment. In E. H. White (Ed.), Symposium on use of small watersheds in determining effects of forest land use on water quality (pp. 88-106). University of Kentucky.
House, W. A., Jickells, T. D., Edwards, A. C., Praska, K. E. & Denison, F. H. (1998). Reactions of phosphorus with sediments in fresh and marine waters. Soil Use and Management 14, 139–146.
Ice, G. G., Stednick, J. D., & Berg, N. H. (2004). The influence of timber harvesting on water quality and sediment transport. Forest Science, 50(2), 168-178.
Krammes, J. S., & Burns, J. W. (1973). Road construction on Caspar Creek watersheds: Ten-year report on impact. USDA Forest Service Research Paper PSW-93.
Lewis, J., Reid, L. M., & Ziemer, R. R. (2001). The Caspar Creek water balance. In R. R. Ziemer (Ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference (Vol. 1, pp. VII-54–VII-61).
Murphy, J. C. (2020). Changing suspended sediment in United States rivers and streams: linking sediment trends to changes in land use/cover, hydrology and climate, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 24, 991–1010, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-991-2020.
Shah, N.W., Baillie, B. R., Bishop, K., Ferraz, S., Högbom, L., & Nettles, J. (2022). The effects of forest management on water quality. Forest Ecology and Management. 522: 120397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120397.
U.S. Geological Survey. (n.d.). Sediment and Suspended Sediment. Water Science School, USGS.
U.S. Geological Survey. (n.d.). Suspended-sediment concentration and suspended-sediment discharge: Theory, use, and analysis. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C.
Walling, D. E. (2009). The impact of global change on erosion and sediment transport by rivers: current progress and future challenges. UNESCO, Paris.
Ziemer, R. R. (1998). Caspar Creek watershed study: The California context. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-168, pp. 41–53.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Copyright (c) 2025 Lauren Agnew, Johnny Boggs, Phoebe Habeck, Johnny Grace, Ge Sun
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright holder(s) granted JSR a perpetual, non-exclusive license to distriute & display this article.
